University philosohy year 1 course, 1000 word. This paper is due in 36 hours
**Firstly, you need provide a reconstruction of one argument found in the piece. It could be the central argument, or it could be a subsidiary argument. Be sure to follow the principles of charity and faithfulness in developing your reconstruction. This reconstruction should be given in plain prose, similar to that used in the first assignment.
Secondly, you will need to provide a critical assessment of the argument in terms of the tools. You should be thinking in terms of whether the argument is deductive or inductive, and the standards we’ve created for assessing each argument type (valid, reliable, strong, sound, etc.). If you feel that the authors argument is fallacious, clearly identify any fallacies committed by the author, and explain how the author has committed the fallacy.
I have read the guidelines of your work, i believe i can provide you with the best quality of work you are anticipating from this [login to view URL] give me a chance to show you the best i can do at your service.